Billmon weighs the odds
Whiskey Bar: Market Update: "Given the size and power of the forces we face -- the GOP machine, Big Media, the national security Leviathan, the corporate bribemasters -- it seems obvious that only a major upheaval, on the order of FDR's landslide 1932 election -- has any chance of changing the country's direction in any fundamental way. I'm not even sure that kind of change is even possible any more, but I'm reasonably sure it's not going to happen just because the Dems manage to win back a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives this November. Part of me thinks it would be better to stay completely of power until there is a tidal wave of popular discontent -- even desperation -- that will wash the GOP and the authoritarian right out of power for a generation."
Billmon reflects on the news that the London bookmakers now give the odds of the Democrats winning the house as even odds, while rating the chances of a Democratic Senate only around 20%. This reflects understanding of the expert pollsters' interpretation. I have read through the list of contestable seats for the House and Senate, and agree that this estimation appears to be fair.
It is interesting to me that Stirling Newberry has fantasized about the possibility that the GOP gerrymander will prevent the Democrats from winning back the House. And, here is the Billmon wondering if that might not be a good thing. Put a cork in it, and hope for a big explosion.
I actually regard the possibility of a razor-thin margin in the House as a good thing, because liberals Democrats will be in leadership positions, but, unable to pass legislation, they will naturally turn their attentions to investigation. Billmon wishes for independent prosecutors, but there is no such thing. The House will have to do.
A thin majority in the House is not a position of political power, but it does create an investigative power, and places it in the hands of people, who, unlike Senators, are not accustomed to thinking of themselves as Presidential timber. That is reason for cautious optimism.
Billmon reflects on the news that the London bookmakers now give the odds of the Democrats winning the house as even odds, while rating the chances of a Democratic Senate only around 20%. This reflects understanding of the expert pollsters' interpretation. I have read through the list of contestable seats for the House and Senate, and agree that this estimation appears to be fair.
It is interesting to me that Stirling Newberry has fantasized about the possibility that the GOP gerrymander will prevent the Democrats from winning back the House. And, here is the Billmon wondering if that might not be a good thing. Put a cork in it, and hope for a big explosion.
I actually regard the possibility of a razor-thin margin in the House as a good thing, because liberals Democrats will be in leadership positions, but, unable to pass legislation, they will naturally turn their attentions to investigation. Billmon wishes for independent prosecutors, but there is no such thing. The House will have to do.
A thin majority in the House is not a position of political power, but it does create an investigative power, and places it in the hands of people, who, unlike Senators, are not accustomed to thinking of themselves as Presidential timber. That is reason for cautious optimism.
